The Official Website of Atty. Ralph A. Sarmiento

Entire Web attyralph.com & usls.edu.ph

HomeCollege of LawStudents PageBar Exam Tips PageMy BlogsiteMy GuestbookMy Bar Notebooks

Everyone's Legal FormsDownload PageDebate TournamentContact Atty. RalphAbout Atty. RalphUSLS


 

Public International Law

BAR REVIEWER

Rex Book Store, Inc.

ISBN No. 978-971-23-4828-0

 

Title Description:

This is an indispensable text for serious Bar Exam candidates and law students. It is an up-to-date reviewer that covers the great doctrines, key concepts, issues, principles, and the theoretical perspectives that underlie the different areas of Public International Law. It incorporates almost a century of Bar questions but providing answers using contemporary concepts and principles. It covers all the important areas as well as the recent development in the areas of International Environment Law, International Human Rights Law, the Law of International Organizations, Diplomatic Law, International Dispute Settlement, the Law of War and Armed Conflict, the Law against Terrorism, International Humanitarian Law, International Criminal Law, and the Law of the Sea, Airspace and Outer Space.

 

 

 

Atty. Ralph's

YouTube Channel!

 

 

 

 

 

Atty. Ralph on Friendster

 

 

 

 


Everyone's Legal Forms "100% CLEAN" AWARD

 

 

 



JESSUP CUP 2007 

 

 

 

 

Sign my Guestbook!

 

 

 

SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO THE 2008 BAR EXAM QUESTIONS ON PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

 

Q.   The legal yardstick in determining whether usage has become customary international law is expressed in the maxim opinio juris sive necessitates or opinio juris for short. What does the maxim mean? (3%)

 

A.  The maxim “opinio juris sive necessitates” or simply “opinio juris” means that States observe a practice or a norm out of a sense of legal obligation or a belief in its juridical necessity. Opinio juris is the subjective element of international customs, the objective element being the long and consistent practice of States.

 

Q.    Under international law, differentiate “hard law” from “soft law”. (3%)

 

A.  “Hard law” refers to binding international legal norms or those which have coercive character. “Soft law,” on the other hand, refers to norms that are non-binding in character but still have legal relevance. Examples of “hard law” are the provisions of the U.N. Charter, the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and other treaties in force. Examples of “soft law” are resolutions of the U.N. General Assembly and draft articles of the International Law Commission. Soft law usually serves as a precursor of hard law. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is one such example. It was a “soft law” when it was adopted by resolution of the U.N. General Assembly in 1948, but it has led to the development of “hard law” with the adoption of two binding covenants on human rights, i.e., the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

 

Q.   May a treaty violate international law? If your answer is in the affirmative, explain when such may happen. If your answer is in the negative, explain why. (5%)

 

A.    Yes, a treaty may violate international law when at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens) or if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of force in violation of the principles of international law embodied in the Charter of the United Nations. (Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Arts. 52 & 53)

 

 

DOWNLOAD 2008 BAR EXAM QUESTIONS

 

USLS LAW MOOT COURT TEAM

FINISHES AS SEMI-FINALIST TO THE 6th RED CROSS

ASIA-PACIFIC MOOT COURT COMPETITION

ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (IHL) 

 

The USLS Moot Court Team in front of the Hong Court High Court:

Coach Atty. Ralph Sarmiento & oralists Michael Hanz Villaster & Adylyn Dioso.

 

The USLS Law Moot Court Team composed of Mr. Michael Hanz Villaster (3rd Year), Ms. Adylyn Dioso (2nd Year) and Coach Atty. Ralph Sarmiento finished as Semi-Finalist in the recently concluded 6th Red Cross International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Moot Court Competition held in Hong Kong on 7-8 March 2008. The event was co-organized by the Hong Kong Red Cross and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in collaboration with Hong Kong University and the City University of Hong Kong. (Read full story...)

USLS Moot Court Team wins the 2008 National Moot Court Competition on International Humanitarian Law (IHL) held at the Supreme Court En Banc Session Hall, 21 November 2007. (Read full story...)

Atty. Ralph explains fundamental concepts of Public International Law in the IBP Hour hosted by Atty. Andy Hagad & Atty. Jocelle Sigue:

 

 

Click here to View More Video Explanations of

Fundamental Concepts of Public International Law!

 

 

 

Back to Top!

 


Copyright © 2005-2007 Atty. Ralph A. Sarmiento

All Rights Reserved.